> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paolo 
> Bonzini
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 5:35 PM
> To: Alexander Graf
> Cc: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Paul Mackerras; Wood Scott-B07421; kvm-
> [email protected]; [email protected] mailing list; Bhushan 
> Bharat-R65777;
> Gleb Natapov
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kvm: ppc: booke: check range page invalidation 
> progress
> on page setup
> 
> Il 04/10/2013 15:38, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
> >
> > On 07.08.2013, at 12:03, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> >
> >> When the MM code is invalidating a range of pages, it calls the KVM
> >> kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start() notifier function, which calls
> >> kvm_unmap_hva_range(), which arranges to flush all the TLBs for guest 
> >> pages.
> >> However, the Linux PTEs for the range being flushed are still valid at
> >> that point.  We are not supposed to establish any new references to pages
> >> in the range until the ...range_end() notifier gets called.
> >> The PPC-specific KVM code doesn't get any explicit notification of that;
> >> instead, we are supposed to use mmu_notifier_retry() to test whether we
> >> are or have been inside a range flush notifier pair while we have been
> >> referencing a page.
> >>
> >> This patch calls the mmu_notifier_retry() while mapping the guest
> >> page to ensure we are not referencing a page when in range invalidation.
> >>
> >> This call is inside a region locked with kvm->mmu_lock, which is the
> >> same lock that is called by the KVM MMU notifier functions, thus
> >> ensuring that no new notification can proceed while we are in the
> >> locked region.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]>
> >
> > Acked-by: Alexander Graf <[email protected]>
> >
> > Gleb, Paolo, please queue for 3.12 directly.
> 
> Here is the backport.  The second hunk has a nontrivial conflict, so
> someone please give their {Tested,Reviewed,Compiled}-by.

{Compiled,Reviewed}-by: Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]>

Thanks
-Bharat

> 
> Paolo
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> index 1c6a9d7..c65593a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> @@ -332,6 +332,13 @@ static inline int kvmppc_e500_shadow_map(struct
> kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500,
>       unsigned long hva;
>       int pfnmap = 0;
>       int tsize = BOOK3E_PAGESZ_4K;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +     unsigned long mmu_seq;
> +     struct kvm *kvm = vcpu_e500->vcpu.kvm;
> +
> +     /* used to check for invalidations in progress */
> +     mmu_seq = kvm->mmu_notifier_seq;
> +     smp_rmb();
> 
>       /*
>        * Translate guest physical to true physical, acquiring
> @@ -449,6 +456,12 @@ static inline int kvmppc_e500_shadow_map(struct
> kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500,
>               gvaddr &= ~((tsize_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
>       }
> 
> +     spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +     if (mmu_notifier_retry(kvm, mmu_seq)) {
> +             ret = -EAGAIN;
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
>       kvmppc_e500_ref_setup(ref, gtlbe, pfn);
> 
>       kvmppc_e500_setup_stlbe(&vcpu_e500->vcpu, gtlbe, tsize,
> @@ -457,10 +470,13 @@ static inline int kvmppc_e500_shadow_map(struct
> kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500,
>       /* Clear i-cache for new pages */
>       kvmppc_mmu_flush_icache(pfn);
> 
> +out:
> +     spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
>       /* Drop refcount on page, so that mmu notifiers can clear it */
>       kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> 
> -     return 0;
> +     return ret;
>  }
> 
>  /* XXX only map the one-one case, for now use TLB0 */
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to