On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:36:36AM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:22:27PM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > The current KVM code relies on a number of definitions to exist for each
> > architecture:
> > KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT
> > KVM_NR_HPAGE_SIZES
> > KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE
> >
> > However, these defines are only used in the gfn_to_index function, which
> > is only used in the x86 code. This series moves the gfn_to_index
> > function from the generic KVM code into the x86 world and gets rid of
> > the definitions from archiectures that don't use them. s390 actually
> > uses these values in other code, so we leave that part untouched.
> >
> > Patches based on kvm/next and available here:
> > git://git.linaro.org/people/cdall/linux-kvm-arm.git kvm-pagesize-cleanup
> >
> > Christoffer Dall (6):
> > KVM: Move gfn_to_index to x86 specific code
> > KVM: ARM: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > KVM: arm64: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > KVM: mips: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > KVM: ia64: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> > KVM: PPC: Get rid of KVM_HPAGE defines
> >
>
> Any comments on this one? I'd very much like to merge huge page support
> for KVM/ARM during the next merge window and it depends on this
> series.
>
Looks fine to me, but why have you skipped s390?
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
