On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 12:50:47PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 28 January 2014 16:28, Christoffer Dall <[email protected]> > wrote: > > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt > > b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt > > index 366bf4b..e11f09d 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt > > @@ -2565,6 +2565,10 @@ executed a memory-mapped I/O instruction which could > > not be satisfied > > by kvm. The 'data' member contains the written data if 'is_write' is > > true, and should be filled by application code otherwise. > > > > +The 'data' member contains, in its first 'len' bytes, the value as it would > > +appear if the VCPU performed a load or store of the appropriate width > > directly > > +to the byte array. > > I don't think you need my acked-by as such (though if you want it you > have it), but since I was one of the people arguing in this thread I guess > I should say specifically that I'm happy with this wording. > Paolo, Gleb,
Will you apply this one directly (assuming you also agree) or do you want me to include it as part of a pull request? Thanks, -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
