David S. Ahern wrote:
The short answer is that I am still see large system time hiccups in the
guests due to kscand in the guest scanning its active lists. I do see
better response for a KVM_MAX_PTE_HISTORY of 3 than with 4. (For
completeness I also tried a history of 2, but it performed worse than 3
which is no surprise given the meaning of it.)


I have been able to scratch out a simplistic program that stimulates
kscand activity similar to what is going on in my real guest (see
attached). The program requests a memory allocation, initializes it (to
get it backed) and then in a loop sweeps through the memory in chunks
similar to a program using parts of its memory here and there but
eventually accessing all of it.

Start the RHEL3/CentOS 3 guest with *2GB* of RAM (or more). The key is
using a fair amount of highmem. Start a couple of instances of the
attached. For example, I've been using these 2:

        memuser 768M 120 5 300
        memuser 384M 300 10 600

Together these instances take up a 1GB of RAM and once initialized
consume very little CPU. On kvm they make kscand and kswapd go nuts
every 5-15 minutes. For comparison, I do not see the same behavior for
an identical setup running on esx 3.5.

I haven't been able to reproduce this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ps -elf | grep -E 'memuser|kscand'
1 S root 7 1 1 75 0 - 0 schedu 10:07 ? 00:00:26 [kscand] 0 S root 1464 1 1 75 0 - 196986 schedu 10:20 pts/0 00:00:21 ./memuser 768M 120 5 300 0 S root 1465 1 0 75 0 - 98683 schedu 10:20 pts/0 00:00:10 ./memuser 384M 300 10 600 0 S root 2148 1293 0 75 0 - 922 pipe_w 10:48 pts/0 00:00:00 grep -E memuser|kscand

The workload has been running for about half an hour, and kswapd cpu usage doesn't seem significant. This is a 2GB guest running with my patch ported to kvm.git HEAD. Guest is has 2G of memory.


--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to 
panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to