Bugs item #2019053, was opened at 2008-07-15 18:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by alex_williamson
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2019053&group_id=180599

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: amd
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Alex Williamson (alex_williamson)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: tbench fails on guest when AMD NPT enabled

Initial Comment:
Running on a dual-socket system with AMD 2356 quad-core processors (8 total 
cores), 32GB RAM, Ubuntu Hardy 2.6.24-19-generic (64bit) with kvm-71 userspace 
and kernel modules.  With no module options, dmesg confirms: kvm: Nested Paging 
enabled

Start guest with:

/usr/local/kvm/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda /dev/VM/Ubuntu64 -m 1024 -net 
nic,model=e1000,mac=de:ad:be:ef:00:01 -net tap,script=/root/bin/br0-ifup -smp 8 
-vnc :0

Guest VM is also Ubuntu Hardy 64bit.  On the guest run 'tbench 16 <tbench 
server>'.  System running tbench_srv is a different system in my case.

The tbench client will fail randomly, often quietly with "Child failed with 
status 1", but sometimes more harshly with a glibc double free error.

If I unload the modules and reload w/o npt:

modprobe -r kvm-amd
modprobe -r kvm
modprobe kvm-amd npt=0

dmesg confirms: kvm: Nested Paging disabled

The tbench test now runs over and over successfully.  The test also runs fine 
on an Intel E5450 (no EPT).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Alex Williamson (alex_williamson)
Date: 2008-07-16 09:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=333914
Originator: YES

No, I added mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE) to qemu/vl.c:main() and it
makes no difference.  I'm only starting a 1G guest on an otherwise idle 32G
host, so host memory pressure is pretty light.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Avi Kivity (avik)
Date: 2008-07-16 08:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=539971
Originator: NO

Strange.  If you add an mlockall() to qemu startup, does the test pass?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2019053&group_id=180599
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to