Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think there's a healthy amount of scepticism about whether tdf
really is worth it. This is why I suggested that we need to better
quantify exactly how much this patch set helps things. For instance,
a time drift test for kvm-autotest would be perfect.
tdf is ugly and deviates from how hardware works. A compelling case
is needed to justify it.
On real hardware, the processor won't go away randomly for lengthy
periods. Since software assumes this, we must either provide a
correction or live with guest time not corresponding to real time.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
