Hi, sure.
hope it's OK
n.
PS: I mean't PATCH, not PATH of course. Although it was quite a long path to
patch :)
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 05:34:14PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Nikola Ciprich wrote:
>>> Should that be ">=" for future use?
>>>
>> nope, newer versions have also the flag parameter (see 2.6.27-rcX), so this
>> is intended only for 2.6.26
>>
>>
>
> Please resend the patch as I don't have it in my mailbox.
>
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>
--
-------------------------------------
Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava
tel.: +420 596 603 142
fax: +420 596 621 273
mobil: +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz
mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------
diff -Naur kvm-72/kernel/anon_inodes.c
kvm-72-fix-2.6.26-anon-inode/kernel/anon_inodes.c
--- kvm-72/kernel/anon_inodes.c 2008-07-27 12:08:56.000000000 +0200
+++ kvm-72-fix-2.6.26-anon-inode/kernel/anon_inodes.c 2008-07-29
10:36:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -245,6 +245,15 @@
return fd;
}
+#elif LINUX_VERSION_CODE == KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,26)
+
+int kvm_anon_inode_getfd(const char *name,
+ const struct file_operations *fops,
+ void *priv, int flags)
+{
+ return anon_inode_getfd(name, fops, priv);
+}
+
#else
int kvm_anon_inode_getfd(const char *name,
