Max Krasnyansky wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Any objections to applying this series? It seems like the consensus
is that OHCI support is better long term but this series seems pretty
sane and self-contained.
I'm actually having seconds thought on the OHCI vs UHCI. You probably
saw my reply to Paul. New UHCI code is fairly clean and simple, and is
working well. But I definitely think that we should fix OHCI too, and
at some point we need to add EHCI (ie USB 2.0 stuff).
I have more patches coming. I made isoc transactions work on Friday
which made MS VX-3000 USB camera totally usable (will send a patch in
a couple of hours). And I'm working on making control transactions
async too which should shave off last bits of bad latency
(2-3milliseconds) from the USB code. Initially I thought control stuff
is not very frequent but this stupid USB webcam drivers does one very
often.
So yeah, it be nice if this stuff is merged soonish :).
btw If you're using git as a front end to the SVN I can push my git
tree somewhere to kernel.org so that you can just pull the whole thing.
Yes, please do for the future.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
