> > +config PCI_ARI
 > > +  bool "PCI ARI support"
 > > +  depends on PCI
 > > +  default n
 > > +  help
 > > +    This enables PCI Alternative Routing-ID Interpretation.
 > 
 > This Kconfig help text is a little weak. Why not include the text
 > you've already written here:
 > 
 >      Support Alternative Routing-ID Interpretation (ARI), which
 >      increases the number of functions that can be supported by a PCIe
 >      endpoint. ARI is required by SR-IOV.

I agree with this improvement to the help text.  But a further question
is whether ARI even merits its own user-visible config option.  Is it
worth having yet another choice for users?  When would someone want ARI
but not SR-IOV?

 - R.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to