From: Mohammed Gamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since checking for vcpu->arch.rmode.active is already done whenever we
call handle_rmode_exception(), checking it inside the function is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index e8fed9b..9591ca7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2224,9 +2224,6 @@ static void kvm_guest_debug_pre(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int handle_rmode_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
int vec, u32 err_code)
{
- if (!vcpu->arch.rmode.active)
- return 0;
-
/*
* Instruction with address size override prefix opcode 0x67
* Cause the #SS fault with 0 error code in VM86 mode.
--
1.6.0.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
