Tian, Kevin wrote: >> >> No. Maybe the Neocleus polarity trick (which also reduces performance). >> > > To my knowledge, Neocleus polarity trick can't solve this isolation > issue, which just provides one effecient way to track assertion/deassertion > transition on the irq line. For example, reverse polarity when receiving an > instance, and then a new irq instance would occur when all devices de- > assert on shared irq line, and then recover the polarity. In your concerned > case where guest driver misbehaves, this polarity trick can't work neither > as one device always asserts the line. >
You're right, I didn't think it through. If there was a standard way to mask pci irqs, it might have worked, but there isn't, unfortunately. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
