H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
No, we're not getting anywhere. This is an outright broken idea.
The space is too small to be able to chop up in this way, and the
number of vendors too large to be able to do it without having a
central oversight.
I suspect we can get a larger number space if we ask Intel & AMD. In
fact, I think we should request that the entire 0x40xxxxxx numberspace
is assigned to virtualization *anyway*.
Yes, that would be good. In that case I'd revise my proposal to back
each leaf block 256 leaves instead of 16. But it still needs to be a
proper enumeration with signatures, rather than assigning fixed points
in that space to specific interfaces.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
