Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2008 schrieb Glauber Costa: > Hi Carsten, > > libkvm/libkvm.c, in function get_free_slot(), we see: > > #if defined(KVM_CAP_SET_TSS_ADDR) && !defined(__s390__) > tss_ext = ioctl(kvm->fd, KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION, KVM_CAP_SET_TSS_ADDR); > #else > tss_ext = 0; > #endif > > Effectively, because of that (and the check that follows), s390 will not > use slot 0. Does it really matters for s390, or is it just a bug? >
It is a bug. See http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=121751623912841&w=2 for a patch proposal. It was not merged because Avi went on vacation and I did not track this patch because we have not finished our kvm-userspace port anyway. This patch is still in our repository and we will send a fix whenever we have our userspace port ready. Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
