Hi Rusty, On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 18:34 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Thursday 11 December 2008 05:04:44 Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 21:11 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > Rusty Russell wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 10 December 2008 08:02:14 Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > >> It would be nice if the virtio-net card wrote some acknowledgement > > > >> that > > > >> it has received the link status down/up events. > > > > > > > > How about of every status change event? ie. a generic virtio_pci > > > > solution? > > > > > > A really simple way to do it would just be to have another status field > > > that was the guest's status (verses the host requested status which the > > > current field is). All config reads/writes result in exits so it's easy > > > to track. > > > > > > Adding YA virtio event may be a little overkill. > > > > Sounds very reasonable; that and Rusty's "mask out unknown bits" > > suggestion in the version below. > > Not quite what I was after. I've taken the original patch, added the > masking change. I'll test here and feed to DaveM.
This never got pushed to davem, did it? What you've got in your queue looks fine to me ... Cheers, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
