On Monday 02 February 2009 06:35:15 Alex Williamson wrote:
> +     sg_set_buf(&sg, &promisc, sizeof(promisc));
> +
> +     if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RX,
> +                               VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RX_PROMISC,
> +                               &sg, 1, 0))

Hmm, can we use sg_init_one(&sg, &promisc, sizeof(promisc)) then pass two sg
to virtnet_send_command?  ie.  change virtnet_send_command to:

        static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 
cmd,
                                struct scatterlist *out, struct scatterlist 
*in);

NULL = no sg, otherwise it's assumed to be a nicely terminated sg?  Neater for
the callers I think...

> -#define VIRTIO_NET_MAX_CTRL_ARGS   2
> +#define VIRTIO_NET_MAX_CTRL_ARGS   3

Oh, and this should probably be called VIRTNET_SEND_COMMAND_SG_MAX, and be
this value minus 2 (ie. informative for the caller of virtnet_send_command).

Thanks,
Rusty.
PS.  Oh, this actual patch was fine: Acked-by: Rusty Russell 
<[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to