On 25/05/14 16:35, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 05:55:43PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Add handlers for all the AArch32 debug registers that are accessible
>> from EL0 or EL1. The code follow the same strategy as the AArch64
>> counterpart with regards to tracking the dirty state of the debug
>> registers.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h |   9 +++
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c        | 137 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h 
>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
>> index 12f9dd7..993a7db 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
>> @@ -93,6 +93,15 @@
>>  #define c10_AMAIR0  (AMAIR_EL1 * 2) /* Aux Memory Attr Indirection Reg */
>>  #define c10_AMAIR1  (c10_AMAIR0 + 1)/* Aux Memory Attr Indirection Reg */
>>  #define c14_CNTKCTL (CNTKCTL_EL1 * 2) /* Timer Control Register (PL1) */
>> +
>> +#define cp14_DBGDSCRext     (MDSCR_EL1 * 2)
>> +#define cp14_DBGBCR0        (DBGBCR0_EL1 * 2)
>> +#define cp14_DBGBVR0        (DBGBVR0_EL1 * 2)
>> +#define cp14_DBGBXVR0       (cp14_DBGBVR0 + 1)
>> +#define cp14_DBGWCR0        (DBGWCR0_EL1 * 2)
>> +#define cp14_DBGWVR0        (DBGWVR0_EL1 * 2)
>> +#define cp14_DBGDCCINT      (MDCCINT_EL1 * 2)
>> +
>>  #define NR_COPRO_REGS       (NR_SYS_REGS * 2)
>>  
>>  #define ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ     0
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> index 98d60d1..5960d5b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> @@ -474,12 +474,148 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>>        NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x70 },
>>  };
>>  
>> +static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +                    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
>> +                    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>> +{
>> +    if (p->is_write) {
>> +            return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
>> +    } else {
>> +            u64 dfr = read_cpuid(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
>> +            u64 pfr = read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
>> +            u32 el3 = !!((pfr >> 12) & 0xf);
>> +
>> +            *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = ((((dfr >> 20) & 0xf) << 28) |
>> +                                      (((dfr >> 12) & 0xf) << 24) |
>> +                                      (((dfr >> 28) & 0xf) << 20) |
>> +                                      (6 << 16) | (el3 << 14) | (el3 << 
>> 12));
>> +            return true;
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool trap_debug32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +                     const struct sys_reg_params *p,
>> +                     const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>> +{
>> +    if (p->is_write) {
>> +            vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
>> +            vcpu->arch.debug_flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
>> +    } else {
>> +            *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(n)                                      \
>> +    /* DBGBCRn */                                           \
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm((n)), Op2( 4), trap_debug32,    \
>> +      NULL, (cp14_DBGBCR0 + (n) * 2) },                     \
>> +    /* DBGBVRn */                                           \
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm((n)), Op2( 5), trap_debug32,    \
>> +      NULL, (cp14_DBGBVR0 + (n) * 2) },                     \
> 
> I think you switched the order of DBGBCRn and DBGBVRn here?  Opc2==4 is
> the DBGBVR and Opc2==5 is the DBGBCR0.

I can't get it right, can I? It's amazing that it worked...

>> +    /* DBGWVRn */                                           \
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm((n)), Op2( 6), trap_debug32,    \
>> +      NULL, (cp14_DBGWVR0 + (n) * 2) },                     \
>> +    /* DBGWCRn */                                           \
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm((n)), Op2( 7), trap_debug32,    \
>> +      NULL, (cp14_DBGWCR0 + (n) * 2) }
>> +
>> +#define DBGBXVR(n)                                          \
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 1), CRm((n)), Op2( 1), trap_debug32,    \
>> +      NULL, cp14_DBGBXVR0 + n * 2 }
>> +
>>  /* Trapped cp14 registers */
>>  static const struct sys_reg_desc cp14_regs[] = {
>> +    /* DBGIDR */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm( 0), Op2( 0), trap_dbgidr },
>> +    /* DBGDTRRXext */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm( 0), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
>> +
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(0),
>> +    /* DBGDSCRint */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm( 1), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(1),
>> +    /* DBGDCCINT */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm( 2), Op2( 0), trap_debug32 },
>> +    /* DBGDSCRext */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm( 2), Op2( 2), trap_debug32 },
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(2),
>> +    /* DBGDTRTXext */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm( 3), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(3),
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(4),
> 
> So we don't have a handler for the TRRX_int (nor the TRRX_EL0).  I
> understand that it doesn't make sense to keep state for them or
> context-switch them, but do we never trap on these and if we do, is it
> then always valid to inject an undefined exception?

TRRXint has clearly been forgotten (Linux doesn't use it). TRRX_EL0 is
actually handled (see the comment that says DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 in patch 3).

>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(5),
>> +    /* DBGWFAR */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm( 6), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    /* DBGOSECCR */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm( 6), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> 
> So it seems that we generally ignore everything related to external
> debug state, but we don't really document anywhere what our behavior is
> and what is and what is not supported towards the guest...

Happy to document that.

>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(6),
>> +    /* DBGVCR */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 0), CRm( 7), Op2( 0), trap_debug32 },
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(7),
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(8),
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(9),
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(10),
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(11),
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(12),
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(13),
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(14),
>> +    DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR(15),
>> +
>> +    /* DBGDRAR (32bit) */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 1), CRm( 0), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi },
>> +
>> +    DBGBXVR(0),
>> +    /* DBGOSLAR */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 1), CRm( 0), Op2( 4), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    DBGBXVR(1),
>> +    /* DBGOSLSR */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 1), CRm( 1), Op2( 4), trap_oslsr_el1 },
>> +    DBGBXVR(2),
>> +    DBGBXVR(3),
>> +    /* DBGOSDLR */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 1), CRm( 3), Op2( 4), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    DBGBXVR(4),
>> +    /* DBGPRCR */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 1), CRm( 4), Op2( 4), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    DBGBXVR(5),
>> +    DBGBXVR(6),
>> +    DBGBXVR(7),
>> +    DBGBXVR(8),
>> +    DBGBXVR(9),
>> +    DBGBXVR(10),
>> +    DBGBXVR(11),
>> +    DBGBXVR(12),
>> +    DBGBXVR(13),
>> +    DBGBXVR(14),
>> +    DBGBXVR(15),
>> +
>> +    /* DBGDSAR (32bit) */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 2), CRm( 0), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi },
>> +
> 
> we don't handle access to any implementation defined debug registers?
> Did we actually check what would be implemented for the cores we
> support?

No. So far, I've stuck with what the ARM ARM describe. Unless you're
thinking of a particular register I may ignored?

>> +    /* DBGDEVID2 */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm( 0), Op2( 7), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    /* DBGDEVID1 */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm( 1), Op2( 7), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    /* DBGDEVID */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm( 2), Op2( 7), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    /* DBGCLAIMSET */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm( 8), Op2( 6), trap_raz_wi },
>> +    /* DBGCLAIMCLR */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm( 9), Op2( 6), trap_raz_wi },
>> +
> 
> nit: why the sudden blank line?
> 
>> +    /* DBGAUTHSTATUS */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm(14), Op2( 6), trap_dbgauthstatus_el1 },
>>  };
>>  
>>  /* Trapped cp14 64bit registers */
>>  static const struct sys_reg_desc cp14_64_regs[] = {
>> +    /* DBGDRAR (64bit) */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRm( 1), .access = trap_raz_wi },
>> +
>> +    /* DBGDSAR (64bit) */
>> +    { Op1( 0), CRm( 2), .access = trap_raz_wi },
>>  };
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -527,7 +663,6 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
>>      { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 3), Op2( 0), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_AMAIR0 },
>>      { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 3), Op2( 1), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_AMAIR1 },
>>      { Op1( 0), CRn(13), CRm( 0), Op2( 1), access_vm_reg, NULL, c13_CID },
>> -
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_64_regs[] = {
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.4
>>
> 


-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to