2014-08-22 00:19+0530, Raghavendra K T:
> On 08/21/2014 09:38 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> >Introduce preempt notifiers for architecture specific code.
> >Advantage over creating a new notifier in every arch is slightly simpler
> >code and guaranteed call order with respect to kvm_sched_in.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
> >---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra KT <raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> No surprise that ia64 doesn't show here :).

Oh, totally forgot about its predicted comeback ...
Paolo, do you want to fixup this?  (It removes double newline.)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
index 0729ba6..1630624 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
@@ -1468,6 +1468,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        kfree(vcpu->arch.apic);
 }
 
+void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+}
 
 long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
                         unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)

>                                             and I also would have liked
> static inlines (as indicated by Paolo).

I'll send a patch that converts empty functions into static inlines,
maybe return-0s too, soon(ish).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to