On 27/11/2014 20:03, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The interesting one is [3/4], which improves upon a previous CVE fix;
> we also handle logical destination wrapping in it, so [2/4] does the
> same for physical;  and to make it nicer, [1/4] removes a condition.
> [4/4] makes our fast path return true when the message was handled.
> 
> Radim Krčmář (4):
>   KVM: x86: deliver phys lowest-prio
>   KVM: x86: fix APIC physical destination wrapping
>   KVM: x86: allow 256 logical x2APICs again
>   KVM: x86: don't retry hopeless APIC delivery
> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h |  2 --
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 

So the order should be 1/2/5/3/4, right?

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to