On 2014-12-20 02:07:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 19/12/2014 11:59, [email protected] wrote: > > Since we decided not to go with KVM due to stability issue, we could let > > this go, thanks. > > That's a pity. That said, your decision to not go with KVM due to > stability is a bit strange: > > 1) unless you are using open source Xen, you are presumably going for a > commercial solution that would cost you money anyway. Have you thought > of asking for commercial support, either from Canonical (since you were > using Ubuntu) or from anyone else? > > 2) I saw now that you were using 3.13. I'm sorry for not having noticed > that early, but have you tried upgrading the kernel? There is a known > bug with Ivy Bridge EP and hv_vapic, but it's fixed on newer kernels > (3.16). If you are not going to pay anyone for support, you probably Hi, Paolo, do you mean the commit fc57ac2 KVM: lapic: sync highest ISR to hardware apic on EOI ? I want to backport it to our product.
Thanks, Zhang Haoyu > should have thought about this yourself. If you hadn't thought about > it, and you are going for an open source solution (which I hope), you > probably should re-evaluate the plan of not paying anyone for support, > either a company or someone with enough expertise. > > Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
