On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:48:46 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > static void kvmppc_vcore_blocked(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
> > {
> > - DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> > + DEFINE_SWAITER(wait);
> >
> > - prepare_to_wait(&vc->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > + swait_prepare(&vc->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > vc->vcore_state = VCORE_SLEEPING;
> > spin_unlock(&vc->lock);
> > schedule();
> > - finish_wait(&vc->wq, &wait);
> > + swait_finish(&vc->wq, &wait);
> > spin_lock(&vc->lock);
> > vc->vcore_state = VCORE_INACTIVE;
> > }
> > @@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@
> > kvmppc_create_dtl_entry(vcpu, vc);
> > kvmppc_start_thread(vcpu);
> > } else if (vc->vcore_state == VCORE_SLEEPING) {
> > - wake_up(&vc->wq);
> > + swait_wake(&vc->wq);
>
> I notice everywhere you have a swait_wake_interruptible() but here. Is
> there a reason why?
>
Of course I could have misread this patch, and this specific work queue
will only be woken up by swait_wake() and not
swait_wake_interruptible(). If that's the case, then its fine as is
(except for that typo I pointed out before).
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
