From: David Kaplan <[email protected]>

KVM has nice wrappers to access the register values, clean up a few places
that should use them but currently do not.

Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <[email protected]>
[forward port and testing]
Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |   19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index d319e0c..a7d88e4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -2757,11 +2757,11 @@ static int invlpga_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
        struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
 
-       trace_kvm_invlpga(svm->vmcb->save.rip, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX],
-                         vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]);
+       trace_kvm_invlpga(svm->vmcb->save.rip, kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, 
VCPU_REGS_RCX),
+                         kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX));
 
        /* Let's treat INVLPGA the same as INVLPG (can be optimized!) */
-       kvm_mmu_invlpg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]);
+       kvm_mmu_invlpg(vcpu, kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX));
 
        svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3;
        skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
@@ -2770,7 +2770,7 @@ static int invlpga_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 static int skinit_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
-       trace_kvm_skinit(svm->vmcb->save.rip, 
svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]);
+       trace_kvm_skinit(svm->vmcb->save.rip, kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, 
VCPU_REGS_RAX));
 
        kvm_queue_exception(&svm->vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
        return 1;
@@ -3133,7 +3133,7 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned 
ecx, u64 *data)
 
 static int rdmsr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
-       u32 ecx = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
+       u32 ecx = kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
        u64 data;
 
        if (svm_get_msr(&svm->vcpu, ecx, &data)) {
@@ -3142,8 +3142,8 @@ static int rdmsr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
        } else {
                trace_kvm_msr_read(ecx, data);
 
-               svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = data & 0xffffffff;
-               svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = data >> 32;
+               kvm_register_write(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX, data & 
0xffffffff);
+               kvm_register_write(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDX, data >> 32);
                svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 2;
                skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
        }
@@ -3246,9 +3246,8 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct 
msr_data *msr)
 static int wrmsr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
        struct msr_data msr;
-       u32 ecx = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
-       u64 data = (svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] & -1u)
-               | ((u64)(svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] & -1u) << 32);
+       u32 ecx = kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
+       u64 data = kvm_read_edx_eax(&svm->vcpu);
 
        msr.data = data;
        msr.index = ecx;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to