> From the perspective of avoiding impacting other architectures, this is a > good idea, but the naming seems strange in the x86 case. Having > irqchip_in_kernel be "true" when the ioapic/pic are in userspace seems > strange. Admittedly, the irqchip isn't a "real" concept on x86, so > inventing a new meaning is fine.
>From the KVM point of view, the "irqchip" is whatever delivers interrupts to the vCPU---which is the LAPIC for x86. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
