Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@hotmail.com> writes:

> Introduce __vmx_flush_tlb() to handle specific vpid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@hotmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 794c529..7188c5e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -1343,13 +1343,13 @@ static void loaded_vmcs_clear(struct loaded_vmcs 
> *loaded_vmcs)
>                        __loaded_vmcs_clear, loaded_vmcs, 1);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_single(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_single(int vpid)
>  {
> -     if (vmx->vpid == 0)
> +     if (vpid == 0)
>               return;
>  
>       if (cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_single())
> -             __invvpid(VMX_VPID_EXTENT_SINGLE_CONTEXT, vmx->vpid, 0);
> +             __invvpid(VMX_VPID_EXTENT_SINGLE_CONTEXT, vpid, 0);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_global(void)
> @@ -1358,10 +1358,10 @@ static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_global(void)
>               __invvpid(VMX_VPID_EXTENT_ALL_CONTEXT, 0, 0);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void vpid_sync_context(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +static inline void vpid_sync_context(int vpid)
>  {
>       if (cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_single())
> -             vpid_sync_vcpu_single(vmx);
> +             vpid_sync_vcpu_single(vpid);
>       else
>               vpid_sync_vcpu_global();
>  }

Not sure myself what's the right thing to do but this may be undesirable
in a nested environment. Assuming the processor supports global invalidation
only, this seems like a easy way for the nested guest to invalidate *all*
mappings - even the L1 specific mappings.


> @@ -3450,9 +3450,9 @@ static void exit_lmode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  #endif
>  
> -static void vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static inline void __vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vpid)
>  {
> -     vpid_sync_context(to_vmx(vcpu));
> +     vpid_sync_context(vpid);
>       if (enable_ept) {
>               if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa))
>                       return;
> @@ -3460,6 +3460,11 @@ static void vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       }
>  }
>  
> +static void vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     __vmx_flush_tlb(vcpu, to_vmx(vcpu)->vpid);
> +}
> +
>  static void vmx_decache_cr0_guest_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>       ulong cr0_guest_owned_bits = vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits;
> @@ -4795,7 +4800,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool 
> init_event)
>       vmx_fpu_activate(vcpu);
>       update_exception_bitmap(vcpu);
>  
> -     vpid_sync_context(vmx);
> +     vpid_sync_context(vmx->vpid);
>  }
>  
>  /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to