On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 06:44:21PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi Christoffer,
> 
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> > index 9ed8d53..f4ea950 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> > @@ -1422,34 +1422,43 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct 
> > kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  /*
> >   * Save the physical active state, and reset it to inactive.
> >   *
> > - * Return 1 if HW interrupt went from active to inactive, and 0 otherwise.
> > + * Return true if there's a pending level triggered interrupt line to 
> > queue.
> >   */
> > -static int vgic_sync_hwirq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_lr vlr)
> > +static bool vgic_sync_hwirq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr, struct vgic_lr 
> > vlr)
> >  {
> >     struct irq_phys_map *map;
> > +   bool phys_active;
> >     int ret;
> >  
> >     if (!(vlr.state & LR_HW))
> >             return 0;
> >  
> >     map = vgic_irq_map_search(vcpu, vlr.irq);
> > -   BUG_ON(!map || !map->active);
> > +   BUG_ON(!map);
> >  
> >     ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(map->irq,
> >                                 IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
> > -                               &map->active);
> > +                               &phys_active);
> >  
> >     WARN_ON(ret);
> >  
> > -   if (map->active) {
> > +   if (phys_active) {
> > +           /*
> > +            * Interrupt still marked as active on the physical
> > +            * distributor, so guest did not EOI it yet.  Reset to
> > +            * non-active so that other VMs can see interrupts from this
> > +            * device.
> > +            */
> >             ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(map->irq,
> >                                         IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
> >                                         false);
> >             WARN_ON(ret);
> > -           return 0;
> > +           return false;
> >     }
> >  
> > -   return 1;
> > +   /* Mapped edge-triggered interrupts not yet supported. */
> > +   WARN_ON(vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, vlr.irq));
> > +   return process_level_irq(vcpu, lr, vlr);
> 
> Don't you miss the dist->lock here? The other call to
> process_level_irq() certainly does it, and Eric recently removed the
> coarse grained lock around the whole __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate() function.
> So we don't hold the lock here, but we change quite some common VGIC
> state in there.
> 

Indeed I think we should.

I'll fix that for the next revision.

Thanks,
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to