On 11/03/2015 08:30 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon,  2 Nov 2015 17:13:08 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.x...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

It avoid explicit Mutex and will be used by NVDIMM ACPI

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.x...@linux.intel.com>
  hw/acpi/aml-build.c         | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h |  1 +
  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
index 9f792ab..8bee8b2 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
@@ -696,14 +696,36 @@ Aml *aml_while(Aml *predicate)

  /* ACPI 1.0b: Named Objects Encoding: DefMethod */
-Aml *aml_method(const char *name, int arg_count)
+static Aml *__aml_method(const char *name, int arg_count, bool serialized)
We don't have many users of aml_method() yet, so I'd prefer to have a single
vs multiple function call:

I suggest to do something like:
typedef enum {
} AmlSerializeRule;

aml_method(const char *name, AmlSerializeRule rule, int synclevel);

with current users fixed up with AML_NONSERIALIZED argument.

Okay. It looks good to me, will follow it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to