On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:44:54PM +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>  Hello!
> >  By this time i'll make a very minimal version of patch 0001, for you to 
> > test it. If we have
> > problems with current 0001, which we
> > cannot solve quickly, we could stick to that version then, which will 
> > provide the necessary
> > changes to plug in LPIs, yet with
> > minimal changes (it will only remove vgic_irq_lr_map).
> >  I guess i should have done it before. Or, i could even respin v5, with 
> > current 0001 split up.
> > This should make it easier to bisect
> > the problem.
>  So, i have just sent v5, conditions are the same as before. It is OK to stop 
> at any point, and actually you should be able to
> easily throw away 0003 and apply just 1, 2, 4. The minimum needed thing for 
> LPIs introduction is 0001.
>  You can also stick to v4 if the problem does not get triggered by its first 
> patch, if you prefer reduced commit log.
Actually, I seem to have been just incredibly unlucky with my test
cycles, because I eventually reproduced the bug without your patches.

I'm going to take this version of the series because that's what I
reviewed and tested.

Sorry for the noise.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to