On 05/11/2015 03:04, Kai Huang wrote: > > Thanks for applying! I am really sorry that I forgot to delete the line > that clears SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML bit in vmx_disable_pml, which is > renamed to vmx_destroy_pml_buffer now. > It won't impact functionality but to make the function consistent, would > you also do below? Sorry for such negligence! > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > index 89f4fa2..ef4ca76 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -7826,8 +7826,6 @@ static void vmx_destroy_pml_buffer(struct vcpu_vmx > *vmx) > ASSERT(vmx->pml_pg); > __free_page(vmx->pml_pg); > vmx->pml_pg = NULL; > - > - vmcs_clear_bits(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, > SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML); > }
No problem. I haven't yet pushed to kvm/next, so I can change this commit. Thanks for the quick response. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
