ction will be re-executed. >> >> Do you want it to be covered for now? For exception, it is easy but >> for IRQ, it needs to be pushed back. >> > Yes I want it to be covered now otherwise any serial exception > generates flood of "Exception happens serially" messages. This > function does not handle IRQ so no problem there.
But we soon will let this function cove IRQ as well per SDM. Why not do that a little bit later? BTW, this issue exist in original code as well. Eddie-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
