On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 06:39:06PM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
> ction will be re-executed.
> >>
> >> Do you want it to be covered for now? For exception, it is easy but
> >> for IRQ, it needs to be pushed back.
> >>
> > Yes I want it to be covered now otherwise any serial exception
> > generates flood of "Exception happens serially" messages. This
> > function does not handle IRQ so no problem there.
>
> But we soon will let this function cove IRQ as well per SDM.
> Why not do that a little bit later?
>
> BTW, this issue exist in original code as well.
>
Yes, but I've already sent a patch to fix this in existing code. It
your patch will fix this to I'll drop my version.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
