On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 03:48:41PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Addressing comment and covering irqfd (did not remove the deadlock avoidance 
> there since it might be useful later).

I can't see any reason why serializing the vm ioctl is a bad idea.

There is one indication of disagreement here:

http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5661/

"The original intent was that kvm_arch_vcpu_create() not "link in" the
vcpu to any registers. That allows most of the vcpu creation to happen
outside a lock."

But I fail to see the case where vcpu creation is a fast path (unless
you're benchmarking cpu hotplug/hotunplug).

Note there is no risk of a deadlock in case a vcpu thread attempts to
execute vm_ioctl.

Also vm_ioctl_lock will always be the first lock grabbed in the vm_ioctl
path, and not used in any other path, there's no risk of deadlock.

The reason for this is there are sites, such as KVM_CREATE_PIT, which
handle concurrency properly (with custom locking that becomes obsolete),
but some don't.


Index: kvm/include/linux/kvm_host.h
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ kvm/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ struct kvm {
                                        KVM_PRIVATE_MEM_SLOTS];
        struct kvm_vcpu *vcpus[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
        struct list_head vm_list;
+       struct mutex vm_ioctl_lock; /* protects concurrent vm fd ioctls */
        struct mutex lock; /*
                            * - protects mmio_bus, pio_bus.
-                           * - protects a few concurrent ioctl's (FIXME).
                            * - protects concurrent create_vcpu, but
                            *   kvm->vcpus walkers do it locklessly (FIXME).
                            */
Index: kvm/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ kvm/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -988,6 +988,7 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(void)
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->irqfds);
        mutex_init(&kvm->lock);
        mutex_init(&kvm->irq_lock);
+       mutex_init(&kvm->vm_ioctl_lock);
        kvm_io_bus_init(&kvm->mmio_bus);
        init_rwsem(&kvm->slots_lock);
        atomic_set(&kvm->users_count, 1);
@@ -2053,6 +2054,9 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *fi
 
        if (kvm->mm != current->mm)
                return -EIO;
+
+       mutex_lock(&kvm->vm_ioctl_lock);
+
        switch (ioctl) {
        case KVM_CREATE_VCPU:
                r = kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(kvm, arg);
@@ -2228,6 +2232,7 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *fi
                r = kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(filp, ioctl, arg);
        }
 out:
+       mutex_unlock(&kvm->vm_ioctl_lock);
        return r;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to