if it's specific to one test or whatever, you could also just put it
inside the message?
Possibly with your own wrapper function around the logging?

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 06:35 -0400, Michael Goldish wrote:
>> Hi Lucas,
>>
>> Before the merge with Autotest we used kvm_log.py to log formatted messages.
>> Each message contained the current test's 'shortname' (e.g. 
>> Fedora.8.32.install), the current date and time (down to a 1 sec resolution) 
>> and the message itself. In addition, debug messages contained the name of 
>> the calling function, e.g.
>> remote_login: Trying to login...
>>
>> What is the preferred way of obtaining this functionality using the new 
>> logging system inside Autotest? Should we define our own logging Handler for 
>> the KVM test in kvm.py, along with our own Formatter, or should we use 
>> logging.config.fileConfig(), or is there another preferred way?
>> I'm particularly interested in printing the name of the caller in debug 
>> messages. This feature makes debugging easier and improves overall 
>> readability of the logs. (Obviously we can manually hardcode the name of the 
>> current function into every debug message, but that doesn't seem like a good 
>> solution.)
>
> The logging system can be configured to display several LogRecord
> attributes, they are documented under
>
> http://docs.python.org/library/logging.html#formatter-objects
>
> %(funcName)s is the name of the function issuing the logging call, so
> that's what we are looking to mirror the wanted functionality.
>
> Creating a logging Handler with a formatter on its own is a possibility,
> although we can propose adding the name of the function to the file
> format being used by autotest. There's allways the concern that an
> excess of information may clutter the logs.
>
> Right now, for files we use the following format:
>
> http://autotest.kernel.org/browser/trunk/client/debug_client.ini
>
> [formatter_file_formatter]
> format=[%(asctime)s %(levelname)-5.5s %(module)s] %(message)s
> datefmt=%m/%d %H:%M:%S
>
> The formatter we're using for the logs contain a timestamp, the debug
> level name and the module (source file except the .py extension). I
> believe this makes debugging easy enough without cluttering too much the
> logs. Do you think the caller name would be an interesting addition even
> considering the above?
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Michael
> --
> Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
> Software Engineer (QE)
> Red Hat - Emerging Technologies
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autotest mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to