Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:30:49AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
> ...
>
>   
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
>> +static int
>> +kvm_assign_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
>> +{
>> +    struct _irqfd *irqfd;
>> +    struct file *file = NULL;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    irqfd = kzalloc(sizeof(*irqfd), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!irqfd)
>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    irqfd->kvm = kvm;
>> +    irqfd->gsi = gsi;
>> +    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irqfd->list);
>> +    INIT_WORK(&irqfd->work, irqfd_inject);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Embed the file* lifetime in the irqfd.
>> +     */
>> +    file = fget(fd);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(file)) {
>> +            ret = PTR_ERR(file);
>> +            goto fail;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Install our own custom wake-up handling so we are notified via
>> +     * a callback whenever someone signals the underlying eventfd
>> +     */
>> +    init_waitqueue_func_entry(&irqfd->wait, irqfd_wakeup);
>> +    init_poll_funcptr(&irqfd->pt, irqfd_ptable_queue_proc);
>> +
>> +    ret = file->f_op->poll(file, &irqfd->pt);
>> +    if (ret < 0)
>> +            goto fail;
>> +
>> +    irqfd->file = file;
>> +
>> +    mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>> +    list_add_tail(&irqfd->list, &kvm->irqfds);
>> +    mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +
>> +fail:
>> +    if (irqfd->wqh)
>> +            remove_wait_queue(irqfd->wqh, &irqfd->wait);
>> +
>> +    if (file && !IS_ERR(file))
>> +            fput(file);
>> +
>> +    kfree(irqfd);
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>>     
>
> It seems that this lets the guest assign an unlimited number of fds
> to the same gsi, potentially using up all of kernel memory.
>
> Since we don't need multiple fds assigned to the same gsi (instead,
> multiple processes can write to the same eventfd to trigger an
> interrupt) let's simply check that no fd is yet assigned to this gsi.
>   

I think Avi asked for this specific feature during review which is the
reason why its there today.  However, I agree that it would probably be
a good idea to put an upper limit on the number of supported aliases
that can be registered.  Will fix.

Thanks Michael,

-Greg


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to