On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 05:53:17PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/05/2009 04:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> I thought of using -smp [processors=]2,cores=4,threads=2 (for a total
>>> of 16 threads), but I think it makes more sense with -cpu.
>>
>>
>> I actually think putting this in -smp makes more sense. -cpu really
>> shouldn't need to be touched by normal users and as long as you can
>> either -cpu host or -cpu safe that should be enough.
>
> Maybe. But in that case -cpu core2duo should imply cores=2 and -smp 2
> -cpu core2duo will bring up 4 cores spread across two sockets.
>
core2duo does not imply 2 cores. OSes use cpuid to discover this
information.
>> But then again maybe we should replace -smp with something more useful
>> like -numa where you'd then specify #CPUs, #cores, mem-cpu connection,
>> etc.
>
> I'd prefer -numa to specify the memory topology (and connections of
> sockets to memory nodes), and -smp or -cpu to specify the intra-socket
> topology.
>
I agree. -numa is a different story. It is possible to have zillion
socket setup without numa at all.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
