On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:56:09PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/07/2009 03:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> +         __kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(bus,&p->dev);
>>>>> +         iosignalfd_release(p);
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>> a single deassign removed multiple irqfds? Looks ugly.
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> Avi requested this general concept.
>>>      
>>
>> Really? Avi, could you explain? I would think each
>> assign needs to be matched with 1 deassign. No?
>>    
>
> Doesn't it follow naturally?

Yes.

> How can a single deassign remove multiple  
> fds (unless all were registered with exactly the same arguments)?
> Maybe we should instead detect that the duplicate iosignaldfds are  
> registered.
>
> Note that we do need to allow the same fd to be multiple times, but not  
> with exactly the same address/match etc.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to