On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:10:24PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:49:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Glauber Costa wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:59:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>> Glauber Costa wrote:
> >>>>     
> >>>>> The goal is to get rid of the call to kvm_init. But those things
> >>>>> are subtle, and often break. So do it in a separate patch, to help
> >>>>> finding potential issues in future bisections.
> >>>>>       
> >>>> Found such an issued: This patch triggers a segfault if no kvm modules
> >>>> are loaded and you start qemu without -no-kvm. Please have a look.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jan
> >>>>     
> >>> ok, the culprit seems to be a 
> >>>
> >>>     if (kvm_enabled())
> >>>         return;
> >>>
> >>> in the beginning of code_gen_alloc.
> >>>
> >>> It is 7f3d0cbe, by Avi, and according to changelog, suggested by anthony.
> >>> I however, fail to realise the purpose of this optimization. For one 
> >>> thing,
> >>> it totally dictates that kvm has absolutely to be enabled or disabled 
> >>> prior
> >>> to this point. No mind changing later. Also, the real deal is to be able
> >>> to compile out tcg entirely. The strategy of just disabling the code gen
> >>> alloc is a minor nitpick that just papers over this.
> >>>   
> >> I agree with you in principle but I think reverting this papers over an  
> >> issue.
> >>
> >> Why are we touching code_gen_ptr when using KVM?  Can someone post the  
> >> full back trace?
> > we're not.
> > 
> > The issue happens exactly when the kvm modules are not loaded, then we're 
> > failing
> > to initialize kvm. However, in the patch that raised this issue, I'm moving
> > KVM initialization to after this code path. And in qemu-kvm.git, kvm is
> > enabled-by-default. So tcg code would think kvm is enabled and skip 
> > initialization,
> > while kvm code will fail to really initialize itself later.
> > 
> > Result? Mayhem.
> > 
> 
> I think we should simply resolves this the way upstream does: Do not
> start if modules are missing and -no-kvm is omitted - or even switch
> over to -enable-kvm as I think you already suggested in some other
> thread. Then we can either fail or succeed, but not fall back more or
> less silently. This falling back of qemu-kvm to tcg is a constant source
> of confusion anyway.

switching to --enable-kvm would be my preferred solution, but guys from
mgmt tools may not like it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to