On 08/19/2009 09:40 AM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
So if I whip up a virtio-net backend for vbus with a PCI compliant
connector, you are happy?
This doesn't improve virtio-net in any way.
Any why not? (Did you notice I said "PCI compliant", i.e. over virtio-pci)
Because virtio-net will have gained nothing that it didn't have before.
virtio already supports this model; see lguest and s390. Transporting
virtio over vbus and vbus over something else doesn't gain anything over
directly transporting virtio over that something else.
This is not what I am advocating.
What are you advocating? As far as I can tell your virtio-vbus
connector plus the vbus-kvm connector is just that.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
