On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:54:37AM +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> > index fc409e9..3a4e1bd 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> >  #define KVM_SCALE 22
> >  
> >  static int kvmclock = 1;
> > -static unsigned int kvm_wall_update_interval = 5;
> > +unsigned int kvm_wall_update_interval = 5;
> 
> I think the overall idea is very interesting, but I also think that it should 
> be
> disabled by default.  Because of the problems with time in virtualization,
> people are already conditioned to run ntpd inside their guests, and this
> kvmclock change will "fight" with ntpd.  Also, the command "# date 09091323" 
> (or
> whatever) ceases to work like it does on bare-metal, so I think it has to be 
> an
> opt-in feature.
I don't disagree.

Actually, I thought about that myself a few hours after I sent the patch. 
Avi, do you have a word on that ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to