* Peter W. Morreale ([email protected]) wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 13:14 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/summit/cwright_11_open_source_virt.pdf > > > > > > See slide 32. This is without vhost-net. > > > > Thanks. Do you also have latency numbers? > > > > It seems like there's definitely still potential for improvement > > with messages <4K. But for the large messages they indeed > > look rather good. > > > > It's unclear what message size the Alacrity numbers used, but I presume > > it was rather large. > > No. It was 1500. Please see: > > http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/AlacrityVM/Results
That's just MTU. Not the message size. We can infer the message size by the bare metal results (reasonably large), but is helpful to record that. thanks, -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
