On 12/27/2009 11:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/27/2009 06:32 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
Probably a regression in Linux swapping. Rik, Hugh, are you aware of
any? Hugh posted something but it appears to be performance related, not
causing early swap.
Yes, it is a smal bug in the VM.
A fix has been committed to 2.6.33 already.
Is this b39415b273?
Indeed it is.
If so, it doesn't copy [email protected]. Is it queued for -stable?
I do not believe that it is queued for -stable.
Do performance fixes fit with -stable policy?
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
