On 01/20/2010 02:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
To be honest all possible naming schemes for '-cpu<name>' are just as
unfriendly as each other. The only user friendly option is '-cpu host'.

IMHO, we should just pick a concise naming scheme&  document it. Given
they are all equally unfriendly, the one that has consistency with vmware
naming seems like a mild winner.

IIUC, VMware uses "Group A, Group B", etc. which is pretty close to saying Family 10h IMHO.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to