On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:21:02PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> vhost-net only uses memory barriers to control SMP effects
> (communication with userspace potentially running on a different CPU),
> so it should use SMP barriers and not mandatory barriers for memory
> access ordering, as suggested by Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Rusty, any feedback on this one?
Thanks!
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> The above applies on top of net-next-2.6. Does not seem to give any
> measureable performance gain, but seems to generate less code
> and I think it's better to use correct APIs.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index c8c25db..6eb1525 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ int vhost_log_write(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct
> vhost_log *log,
> int i, r;
>
> /* Make sure data written is seen before log. */
> - wmb();
> + smp_wmb();
> for (i = 0; i < log_num; ++i) {
> u64 l = min(log[i].len, len);
> r = log_write(vq->log_base, log[i].addr, l);
> @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ unsigned vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct
> vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> return vq->num;
>
> /* Only get avail ring entries after they have been exposed by guest. */
> - rmb();
> + smp_rmb();
>
> /* Grab the next descriptor number they're advertising, and increment
> * the index we've seen. */
> @@ -996,14 +996,14 @@ int vhost_add_used(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, unsigned
> int head, int len)
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> /* Make sure buffer is written before we update index. */
> - wmb();
> + smp_wmb();
> if (put_user(vq->last_used_idx + 1, &vq->used->idx)) {
> vq_err(vq, "Failed to increment used idx");
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> if (unlikely(vq->log_used)) {
> /* Make sure data is seen before log. */
> - wmb();
> + smp_wmb();
> log_write(vq->log_base, vq->log_addr + sizeof *vq->used->ring *
> (vq->last_used_idx % vq->num),
> sizeof *vq->used->ring);
> @@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> }
> /* They could have slipped one in as we were doing that: make
> * sure it's written, then check again. */
> - mb();
> + smp_mb();
> r = get_user(avail_idx, &vq->avail->idx);
> if (r) {
> vq_err(vq, "Failed to check avail idx at %p: %d\n",
> --
> 1.6.6.144.g5c3af
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
