Am 03.03.2010 um 20:15 schrieb Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>:

This patch adds code to ask the kernel about the svm
features it supports for its guests and propagates them to
the guest. The new capability is necessary because the old
behavior of the kernel was to just return the host svm
features but every svm-feature needs emulation in the nested
svm kernel code. The new capability indicates that the
kernel is aware of that when returning svm cpuid
information.

Do we really need that complexity? By default the kernel masks out unsupported cpuid features anyway. So if we don't have npt guest support (enabled), the kernel module should just mask it out.

IOW, always passing npt should work. No capability should make it get masked out.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to