* Avi Kivity <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 07:27 AM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> >From: Zhang, Yanmin<[email protected]>
> >
> >Based on the discussion in KVM community, I worked out the patch to support
> >perf to collect guest os statistics from host side. This patch is implemented
> >with Ingo, Peter and some other guys' kind help. Yang Sheng pointed out a
> >critical bug and provided good suggestions with other guys. I really
> >appreciate
> >their kind help.
> >
> >The patch adds new subcommand kvm to perf.
> >
> > perf kvm top
> > perf kvm record
> > perf kvm report
> > perf kvm diff
> >
> >The new perf could profile guest os kernel except guest os user space, but it
> >could summarize guest os user space utilization per guest os.
> >
> >Below are some examples.
> >1) perf kvm top
> >[r...@lkp-ne01 norm]# perf kvm --host --guest
> >--guestkallsyms=/home/ymzhang/guest/kallsyms
> >--guestmodules=/home/ymzhang/guest/modules top
> >
>
> Excellent, support for guest kernel != host kernel is critical (I
> can't remember the last time I ran same kernels).
>
> How would we support multiple guests with different kernels? Perhaps a
> symbol server that perf can connect to (and that would connect to guests in
> turn)?
The highest quality solution would be if KVM offered a 'guest extension' to
the guest kernel's /proc/kallsyms that made it easy for user-space to get this
information from an authorative source.
That's the main reason why the host side /proc/kallsyms is so popular and so
useful: while in theory it's mostly redundant information which can be gleaned
from the System.map and other sources of symbol information, it's easily
available and is _always_ trustable to come from the host kernel.
Separate System.map's have a tendency to go out of sync (or go missing when a
devel kernel gets rebuilt, or if a devel package is not installed), and server
ports (be that a TCP port space server or an UDP port space mount-point) are
both a configuration hassle and are not guest-transparent.
So for instrumentation infrastructure (such as perf) we have a large and well
founded preference for intrinsic, built-in, kernel-provided information: i.e.
a largely 'built-in' and transparent mechanism to get to guest symbols.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html