On 04/12/2010 11:01 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
- calculate zapped page number properly in mmu_zap_unsync_children()
- calculate freeed page number properly kvm_mmu_change_mmu_pages()
- restart list walking if have children page zapped
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong<[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index a23ca75..8f4f781 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1483,8 +1483,8 @@ static int mmu_zap_unsync_children(struct kvm *kvm,
for_each_sp(pages, sp, parents, i) {
kvm_mmu_zap_page(kvm, sp);
mmu_pages_clear_parents(&parents);
+ zapped++;
}
- zapped += pages.nr;
kvm_mmu_pages_init(parent,&parents,&pages);
}
This looks correct, I don't understand how we work in the first place.
Marcelo?
@@ -1540,7 +1540,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_change_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned
int kvm_nr_mmu_pages)
page = container_of(kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages.prev,
struct kvm_mmu_page, link);
- kvm_mmu_zap_page(kvm, page);
+ used_pages -= kvm_mmu_zap_page(kvm, page);
used_pages--;
}
This too. Wow.
kvm->arch.n_free_mmu_pages = 0;
@@ -1589,7 +1589,8 @@ static void mmu_unshadow(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
&& !sp->role.invalid) {
pgprintk("%s: zap %lx %x\n",
__func__, gfn, sp->role.word);
- kvm_mmu_zap_page(kvm, sp);
+ if (kvm_mmu_zap_page(kvm, sp))
+ nn = bucket->first;
}
}
I don't understand why this is needed.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
