Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/12/2010 03:27 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> Currently both SVM and VMX have their own DR handling code. Move it to
>> x86.c.
>>
>>    
> 
> The standard process is to make them identical first and finally merge 
> identical code, but I guess we can skip it in this case (Jan?)

Looks OK, I would just...

> +int kvm_set_dr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int dr, unsigned long val)
> +{
> +     switch (dr) {
> +     case 0 ... 3:
> +             vcpu->arch.db[dr] = val;
> +             if (!(vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP))
> +                     vcpu->arch.eff_db[dr] = val;
> +             break;
> +     case 4:
> +             if (kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_DE)) {
> +                     kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
> +                     return 1;
> +             }
> +             /* fall through */
> +     case 6:
> +             if (val & 0xffffffff00000000ULL) {
> +                     kvm_inject_gp(vcpu, 0);
> +                     return -1;

...either return 1 or -1 on failure.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to