Avi Kivity wrote: > On 05/05/2010 03:19 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> When mapping a new parent to unsync shadow page, we should mark >> parent's unsync_children bit >> >> Reported-by: Marcelo Tosatti<[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong<[email protected]> >> --- >> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 4 +++- >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c >> index 97f2ea0..bf35a2f 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c >> @@ -1374,7 +1374,9 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page >> *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >> if (sp->unsync_children) { >> set_bit(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC,&vcpu->requests); >> kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp); >> - } >> + } else if (sp->unsync) >> + kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp); >> + >> trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, false); >> return sp; >> } >> > > > Which patch does this fix? If it wasn't merge yet, please repost with > the fix included.
Oh, OK, i'll sent the previous pathset that are reverted by Marcelo. Thanks, Xiao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
