Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/07/2010 05:43 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
>> From: Dongxiao Xu<dongxiao...@intel.com>
>>
>> SDM suggests VMXON should be called before VMPTRLD, and VMXOFF
>> should be called after doing VMCLEAR.
>>
>> Therefore in vmm coexistence case, we should firstly call VMXON
>> before any VMCS operation, and then call VMXOFF after the
>> operation is done.
>>
>>
>> @@ -4118,7 +4143,10 @@ static void vmx_cpuid_update(struct kvm_vcpu
>> *vcpu) struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
>> struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
>> u32 exec_control;
>> + int cpu;
>>
>> + cpu = get_cpu();
>> + vmx_vcpu_load(&vmx->vcpu, cpu);
>> vmx->rdtscp_enabled = false;
>> if (vmx_rdtscp_supported()) {
>> exec_control = vmcs_read32(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL);
>> @@ -4133,6 +4161,9 @@ static void vmx_cpuid_update(struct kvm_vcpu
>> *vcpu) } }
>> }
>> + vmx_vcpu_put(&vmx->vcpu);
>> + put_cpu();
>> +
>> }
>>
>> static void vmx_set_supported_cpuid(u32 func, struct
>> kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry)
>>
>
> I'm not sure why this is needed. vmx_cpuid_update() is called from a
> vcpu ioctl which should have called vcpu_load() before.
>
> Apart from that, everything looks good for merging.
Vcpu_load() and vcpu_put() is not called in that ioctl. I will add that and
send out another version of patchset.
Thanks,
Dongxiao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
