On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 03:12:49PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
> 
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>


Will apply, thanks!
Just to clarify: does some compiler/checker actually barf on this?

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/net.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index aa88911..cd36f5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static long vhost_net_compat_ioctl(struct file *f, 
> unsigned int ioctl,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -const static struct file_operations vhost_net_fops = {
> +static const struct file_operations vhost_net_fops = {
>       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>       .release        = vhost_net_release,
>       .unlocked_ioctl = vhost_net_ioctl,
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to