On Friday 20 August 2010 19:56:20 Glauber Costa wrote:
> > @@ -675,6 +676,9 @@ struct kvm_clock_data {
> > #define KVM_SET_PIT2 _IOW(KVMIO, 0xa0, struct kvm_pit_state2)
> > /* Available with KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_PVINFO */
> > #define KVM_PPC_GET_PVINFO _IOW(KVMIO, 0xa1, struct kvm_ppc_pvinfo)
> > +/* Available with KVM_CAP_SET_TSC_RATE */
> > +#define KVM_X86_GET_TSC_RATE _IOR(KVMIO, 0xa2, __u32)
> > +#define KVM_X86_SET_TSC_RATE _IOW(KVMIO, 0xa3, __u32)
>
> wrap this into a struct?
I don't think that would improve the code. Generally, we try to *avoid* using
structs in ioctl arguments, although KVM does have a precedent of using structs
there.
In fact, the code here could be simplified by using get_user/put_user on the
simple argument, which would not be possibly with a struct.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
