On 09/10/2010 06:30 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
This patch implements logic to make sure that either a
page-fault/page-fault-vmexit or a nested-page-fault-vmexit
is propagated back to the guest.

@@ -338,6 +338,22 @@ void kvm_inject_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, PF_VECTOR, error_code);
  }

+void kvm_propagate_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       u32 nested, error;
+
+       error   = vcpu->arch.fault.error_code;
+       nested  = error&   PFERR_NESTED_MASK;
+       error   = error&  ~PFERR_NESTED_MASK;
+
+       vcpu->arch.fault.error_code = error;
+
+       if (mmu_is_nested(vcpu)&&  !nested)
+               vcpu->arch.nested_mmu.inject_page_fault(vcpu);
+       else
+               vcpu->arch.mmu.inject_page_fault(vcpu);
+}
+

Tacking a non-architectural bit on top of the error code is not very nice. Can you move it to a separate vcpu->arch.fault.nested?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to